| I study the  shared fantasies that lie at the heart and soul of societies, and that generate  and define the historical process. I focus on collective fantasies that give  rise to cultural forms of violence, such as war, genocide and terrorism. I use  the phrase “making  conscious the unconscious on the stage of social reality” to refer to the  process of identifying and revealing central fantasies that generate societal  violence. “History” is  often conceived as if coming from a place other than the self—as if a dimension  or domain of reality separate from human intention. I seek to reconnect the  outer world with the inner: to show how historical events—war and genocide—manifest  human desires and fantasies. We are the source.
   Ideologies  contain psychic meaning. For any ideology, I pose the question: Why  does this ideology exist? Why was it created? What needs, desires,  anxieties and fantasies does this ideology contain and express? I’m an  empiricist with formal training in experimental psychology. My theories derive  from case studies; specific historical events or phenomena. I’ve developed  a methodology  called “analysis of metaphor” that consists of identifying recurring words  and images in rhetoric of political leaders. Metaphors are not merely  metaphors. They are pregnant with psychological meaning. The meaning of  an ideology is revealed through the metaphors contained within political  language. The leader expresses his own fantasies, and conveys these to an  audience. A political movement is created when the fantasies of a leader  resonate with the fantasies of an audience. The Fuehrer’s  followers expressed their agreement with what he said by standing on their  feet, lifting their right arm, and screaming, “Heil Hitler.” Successful  political rhetoric of any kind elicits a “heil.” Something   the leader says excites his followers.  What are the nature of those fantasies and desires that give rise to—are the  sources of—significant political ideologies and movements? What does an  ideology “do” for a leader and his or her followers? How may we account for  the excitement?According  to Rudolph Rummel, 262 million people died in the 20th century  because of political violence generated by governments. Of course, each episode  of violence had a unique “history.” But are each one of these events unique?  Very doubtful. Is it possible to develop theories accounting for  disparate cases of political violence? |